<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Worst &#8220;Blind Pews&#8221; of U.S. Newspapers, PT II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnwilpers.wordpress.com/2008/07/15/the-worst-blind-pews-of-us-newspapers-pt-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnwilpers.wordpress.com/2008/07/15/the-worst-blind-pews-of-us-newspapers-pt-ii/</link>
	<description>New media consultant John Wilpers blogs on expanding the reach and relevance of mainstream media by partnering with the blogging community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 01:12:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bart</title>
		<link>http://johnwilpers.wordpress.com/2008/07/15/the-worst-blind-pews-of-us-newspapers-pt-ii/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Bart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 23:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilpers.wordpress.com/?p=133#comment-47</guid>
		<description>Come on John, don&#039;t let this site die!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on John, don&#8217;t let this site die!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bart</title>
		<link>http://johnwilpers.wordpress.com/2008/07/15/the-worst-blind-pews-of-us-newspapers-pt-ii/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Bart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 01:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilpers.wordpress.com/?p=133#comment-44</guid>
		<description>Funny!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://johnwilpers.wordpress.com/2008/07/15/the-worst-blind-pews-of-us-newspapers-pt-ii/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilpers.wordpress.com/?p=133#comment-43</guid>
		<description>hahahah you get cheekier and cheekier with these! I love it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hahahah you get cheekier and cheekier with these! I love it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ostensibly</title>
		<link>http://johnwilpers.wordpress.com/2008/07/15/the-worst-blind-pews-of-us-newspapers-pt-ii/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Ostensibly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 20:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilpers.wordpress.com/?p=133#comment-42</guid>
		<description>Then there&#039;s the issue of how fast any brick-and-mortar media can generate a revenue/blog relationship. 

Turnaround seems incredibly slow. Gatehouse Media allegedly got the guts of BostonNOW&#039;s Internet blog plan (past and what was intended to be its future) back in April. 

Still, no big changes over there and Editor &amp; Publisher all but rings the death knell for the 100-plus corp: http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003827609

Can it be that the business side of the news is so ultimately rooted in obsolete-think that even available content and motivated professionals can&#039;t overcome the overwhelming inertia?

Perhaps we have to destroy the village to save it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then there&#8217;s the issue of how fast any brick-and-mortar media can generate a revenue/blog relationship. </p>
<p>Turnaround seems incredibly slow. Gatehouse Media allegedly got the guts of BostonNOW&#8217;s Internet blog plan (past and what was intended to be its future) back in April. </p>
<p>Still, no big changes over there and Editor &amp; Publisher all but rings the death knell for the 100-plus corp: <a href="http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003827609" rel="nofollow">http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003827609</a></p>
<p>Can it be that the business side of the news is so ultimately rooted in obsolete-think that even available content and motivated professionals can&#8217;t overcome the overwhelming inertia?</p>
<p>Perhaps we have to destroy the village to save it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
